MIT Concrete Sustainability Hub

MIT Concrete Sustainability Hub

  • Home
  • About Us
    • Our Mission
    • Research Team
    • Affiliates
    • UMI
    • GDR International
  • Key Impacts
    • Carbon Neutrality
    • Infrastructure
    • Resilience
  • Resources
    • Resources by Topic
    • Interactive Tools and Dashboards
    • Webinars
  • News
  • Social Media
    • Twitter
    • LinkedIn
    • Facebook
    • Youtube
  • MIT
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Our Mission
    • Research Team
    • Affiliates
    • UMI
    • GDR International
  • Key Impacts
    • Carbon Neutrality
    • Infrastructure
    • Resilience
  • Resources
    • Resources by Topic
    • Interactive Tools and Dashboards
    • Webinars
  • News
  • Social Media
    • Twitter
    • LinkedIn
    • Facebook
    • Youtube
  • MIT
MIT

A new one-pager created by the Reduced Carbon Concrete Consortium (RC3) covers the utility of environmental product declarations (EPDs) for pavement decision-making.

Key takeaways:

  • EPDs are not intended to be used to compare the environmental impacts of asphalt and concrete
  • It may be possible to compare EPDs if:
    • Materials are of the same type
    • EPDs are developed under the same PCR
    • Materials meet the same performance requirements
  • EPDs in North America quantify cradle-to-gate emissions, but do not consider construction, use, or end-of-life phases (all three comprise 78% of the life cycle emissions).
  • Cradle-to-gate EPDs can be compared if all subsequent life cycle stages are equivalent for both EPDs.
  • EPDs are useful for:
    • Providing a benchmark for continuous improvement in environmental impacts
    • Evaluating compliance with Buy Clean thresholds
    • Estimating the carbon budget for a project

Further reading:
1. AzariJafari et al. (2023). Suitability of EPDs for Supporting Life Cycle and Comparative Analysis of Concrete Mixtures. Environmental Science and Technology, 57 (19), 7321-7327. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.2c05697.
2. AzariJafari et al. (2021). Towards comparable environmental product declarations of construction materials: Insights from a probabilistic comparative LCA approach. Building and Environment, 190, 107542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.107542.
3. Hossein et al. (2022). The role of performance metrics in comparative LCA of concrete mixtures incorporating solid wastes: A critical review and guideline proposal. Waste Management, 140, 40-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2022.01.010.

  • Research Brief: Next-generation concrete: Combining loadbearing and energy storage solutions

  • Hessam AzariJafari presents for Payette’s YDC Knowledge Series

©2024 Massachusetts Institute of Technology Concrete Sustainability Hub

Accessibility

keyboard_arrow_up